business administration & finance Student book - Download as PDF File OFFICE-ADMINISTRATION-Student-s-Book-Grado-Medio-Burlington .pdf. Business Administration and Management. BAM Quantitative Techniques in Business 2 1 3 3 ACC Public Finance 2 2 4 4. Text books. Burlington Books is one of Europe's most respected publishers of English language teaching materials, with over two million students learning from its books.
|Language:||English, Japanese, Arabic|
|ePub File Size:||27.86 MB|
|PDF File Size:||15.23 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Registration needed]|
Business Administration & Finance, Commerce & Sales, Computing & Information Technology, Office Administration. Restaurants & Catering, Tourism. BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION FINANCE SB GS Burlington Books: pawnfacumapbma.cf: UNKNOWN: Libros. Marketing promotional products history mco capital market can rise to 50 of GDP over time the distribution of Permanent Voters Card PVC to favour areas.
There is much room for exploration of these issues. Drop side cribs pose risks to consumers; so do chainsaws. On what basis should the former be prohibited but the latter not be Hasnas ? On the question of liability, an important issue is whether it is fair to hold manufacturers responsible for harms that their products cause, when the manufacturers are not morally at fault for those harms Piker Advertisements tell us something about a product, and try to persuade us to download it.
Both of these components can be subject to ethical evaluation. Emphasizing its informational component, some writers stress the positive value of advertising.
Markets function efficiently only when certain conditions are met. One of these conditions is perfect information: minimally, consumers have to understand the features of the products for sale.
While this condition will never be fully met in reality, advertising can help to ensure that it is met to a greater degree Heath Another value that can be promoted through advertising is autonomy. People have certain needs and desires—e. Their choices are more likely to satisfy their needs and desires if they have information about what is for sale, which advertising can provide Goldman These good effects depend, of course, on advertisements producing true beliefs, or at least not producing false beliefs, in consumers.
The issue here is not whether deceptive advertising is wrong—most believe it is cf. Child —but what counts as deceptive advertising, and what makes it wrong. Its advertisements were deceptive, and therefore wrong, because they appeared to make a true claim, but in fact made a false claim. But many advertisements that do not seem deceptive make false or unverifiable claims.
It is common to say of these types of claims that they are not warranted as true, and so cannot deceive Carson Yet these claims may in fact deceive some people. Advertisements are deemed deceptive when a reasonable person, not any person at all, is deceived. This makes deception in advertising a matter of results in consumers, not intentions in advertisers. Many reasons have been offered for why deceptive advertising is wrong.
One is the Kantian claim that deceiving others is disrespectful to them, a use of them as a mere means. Deceptive advertising may also lead to harm, to consumers who download suboptimal products, given their desires and competitors who lose out on sales. A final criticism of deceptive advertising is that it erodes trust in society Attas When people do not trust each other, they will either not engage in economic transactions, or engage in them only with costly legal protections.
The persuasive component of advertising is also a fruitful subject of ethical inquiry. Galbraith , an early critic, thinks that advertising, in general, does not inform people how to acquire what they want, but instead gives them new wants. Moreover, since we are inundated with advertising for consumer goods, we want too many of those goods and not enough public goods. Hayek rejects this claim, arguing that few if any of our desires are independent of our environment, and that anyway, desires produced in us through advertising are no less significant than desires produced in us in other ways.
Galbraith is concerned about the persuasive effects of advertisements. In contrast, recent writers focus on persuasive techniques that advertisers use. Some of these are alleged to cross the line into manipulation.
It is difficult to define manipulation precisely, though many attempts have been made see, e. For our purposes, manipulative advertising can be understood as advertising that attempts to persuade consumers, often but not necessarily using non-rational means, to make irrational or suboptimal choices, given their own needs and desires see and cf. Associative advertising is often held up as an example of manipulative advertising.
In associative advertising, the advertiser tries to associate a product with a positive belief, feeling, attitude, or activity which usually has little to do with the product itself. Thus many television commercials for trucks in the U. Commercials for body fragrances associate those products with sex between beautiful people. The suggestion is that if you are a certain sort of person e.
Crisp argues that this sort of advertising attempts to create desires in people by circumventing their faculty of conscious choice, and in so doing subverts their autonomy cf. Arrington ; Phillips Lippke argues that it makes people desire the wrong things, encouraging us to try to satisfy our non-market desires e.
How seriously we take these criticisms may depend on how effective we think associative and other forms of persuasive advertising are. Our judgments on this issue may be context-sensitive. Paine Paine et al. But children, she argues, do not have the capacity for making wise consumer choices see also E.
Moore Thus advertising directed at children—as opposed to advertising of products for children directed at adults—constitutes a form of objectionable exploitation.
Other populations who may be similarly vulnerable are the senile, the ignorant, and the bereaved. Ethics may require not a total ban on marketing to them but special care in how they are marketed to Brenkert Perhaps surprisingly, business ethicists have said little directly about sales.
But much of what is said about advertising also applies to sales. Salespeople are, in a sense, the final advertisers of products to consumers. They provide benefits to consumers in much the same way as advertisers and have the same ability to deceive or manipulate consumers.
Carson works out a detailed theory of ethics for salespeople. Carson justifies 1 — 4 by appealing to the golden rule: treat others as you want to be treated.
He identifies two other duties that salespeople might have he is agnostic : 5 do not sell customers products that you the salesperson think are unsuitable for them, given their needs and desires, without telling customers why you think this; and 6 do not sell customers poor quality or defective products, without telling them why you think this.
For the most part, 1 — 4 ask the salesperson not to harm the customer; 5 and 6 ask the salesperson to help the customer, in particular, help her not to make foolish mistakes. Whether salespeople should help customers in this way may depend on how adversarial their relationship should be.
The broader issue here is one of disclosure. But there is no consensus on what information is relevant to a downloading decision, or what reasonable people want to know. For many products bought and sold in markets, sellers offer an item at a certain price, and downloaders take or leave that price. But in some cases there is negotiation over price and other aspects of the transaction.
The locus classicus for this debate is Carr According to him, bluffing in negotiations is permissible because business has its own special set of rules and bluffing is permissible according to these rules.
Carson agrees that bluffing is permissible in business, though in a more limited range of cases than Carr. If you have good reason to believe that your adversary in a negotiation is misstating her bargaining position, then you are permitted to misstate yours.
A requirement to tell the truth in these circumstances would put you at a significant disadvantage relative to your adversary, which you are not required to suffer. That is, the prices of goods and services are set by the aggregate forces of supply and demand; no individual is able to download or sell a good for anything other than the market price. In reality, things are different.
Sellers of goods have some flexibility about how to price goods. Most business ethicists would accept that, in most cases, the prices at which products should be sold is a matter for private individuals to decide. This view has been defended on grounds of property rights. Some claim that if I have a right to X, then I am free to transfer it to you on whatever terms that I propose and you accept Boatright It has also been defended on grounds of welfare.
Prices set by the voluntary exchanges of individuals reveal valuable information about the relative demand for and supply of goods, allowing resources to flow to their most productive uses Hayek Despite this, most business ethicists recognize some limits on prices. One issue that has received attention recently is price discrimination.
This is widely regarded as wrong. Economists tend to think that price discrimination is valuable insofar as it enables firms to increase output. But the moral status of it is less clear.
When it was revealed that Staples and other online retailers were charging consumers in different zip codes different prices for the same products at the same time, consumers were outraged.
But some writers argue that this practice is no worse than movie theaters giving discounts to children Elegido ; Marcoux The problem may be that Staples and others engaged in this practice without disclosing it. Another issue of pricing ethics is price gouging. Price gouging can be understood as a sharp increase in the price of a necessary good in the wake of an emergency which renders that good scarce.
In the immediate aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans in , for example, many retailers charged very high prices for water and gasoline.
Many jurisdictions have laws against price gouging, and it is widely regarded as unethical Snyder But some theorists defend price gouging. While granting that sales of items in circumstances like these are exploitative, they note that they are mutually beneficial.
Both the seller and downloader prefer to engage in the transaction rather than not engage in it. Moreover, when items are sold at inflated prices, this attracts more sellers into the market. Permitting price gouging may thus be the fastest way of eliminating it Zwolinski For further discussion, see the entry on exploitation.
Most contemporary scholars believe that sellers have wide, though not unlimited, discretion in how much they charge for goods and services. Firms and workers Business ethicists have written much about the relationship between employers and employees. Most of this writing has inquired into the obligations that employers owe to employees. This may be because employers usually have more power than employees, and so have greater discretion in how they treat employees, than employees have in how they treat employers.
Another important topic in this area is privacy. For space reasons this topic will not be discussed, but see the entries on privacy and privacy and information technology.
The question of what criteria employers should not use is addressed in discussions of discrimination. While there is some debate about whether discrimination in employment should be legally prohibited see Epstein , almost everyone agrees that it is morally wrong Hellman ; Lippert-Rasmussen Discussion has focused on two questions.
First, when does the use of a certain criterion in an employment decision count as discriminatory? It seems wrong for Wal-Mart to exclude white applicants for a job in their marketing department, but not wrong for the Hovey Players a theater troupe to exclude white applicants for a production of A Raisin in the Sun. We might say that whether a hiring practice is discriminatory depends on whether the criterion used is job-relevant.
Suppose that white diners prefer to be served by white waiters rather than black waiters. In this case race seems job-relevant, but it also seems wrong for employers to take race into account Mason Another question that has received considerable attention is: What makes discrimination wrong?
Some argue that discrimination is wrong because of its effects on those who are discriminated against Lippert-Rasmussen ; others think that it is wrong because of what it expresses to them Hellman For further discussion, see the entry on discrimination.
According to them, employers have a duty to hire the most qualified applicant. Some justify this duty by appealing to considerations of desert D.
Miller ; others justify it by appealing to equal opportunity Mason The standard challenge to this view appeals to property rights Kershnar A job offer typically implies a promise to pay the job-taker a sum of your money for performing certain tasks.
While we might think that excluding some ways you can dispose of your property e. In support of this, we might think that a small business owner does nothing wrong when she hires her daughter for a part-time job as opposed to a more qualified stranger. Many of the same ethical issues that attend hiring also attend firing. There has been a robust discussion of the ethics of firing in the business ethics literature.
Most would say that it is wrong for an employer to terminate an employee for some reasons, e. Thus the debate is between those who think that employers should be able to terminate employees for any reason with some exceptions, and those who think that employers should be able to terminate employees only for certain reasons.
Arguments for at will employment appeal to freedom or macroeconomic effects. Since the demand for pay typically exceeds the supply, the question of how pay should be distributed is naturally analyzed as a problem of justice.
Two general theories of justice in pay have attracted attention. This view is sometimes justified in terms of property rights.
Employees own their labor, and employers own their capital, and they are free, within broad limits, to dispose of it as they please Boatright According to it, the just wage for a worker is the wage that reflects her contribution to the firm. This view comes in two versions. On the absolute version, workers should receive an amount of pay that equals the value of their contributions to the firm D. On the comparative version, workers should receive an amount of pay that reflects the relative value of their contributions to the firm, given what others in the firm contribute and are paid Sternberg The contribution view strikes some as normatively basic, a view for which no further argument can be given D.
The pay of any employee in a firm can be evaluated from a moral point of view, using the two theories sketched above. But business ethicists have paid particular attention to the pay of certain groups of employees, viz. There has been a robust debate about whether CEOs are paid too much Moriarty a , with scholars falling roughly into two camps.
Reiff There has also been a robust debate about whether workers in sweatshops are paid too little. They say that sweatshops wages, while low by our standards, are not low by the standards of the countries in which the sweatshops are located. This explains why people choose to work in a sweatshop: it is the best offer they have. Efforts to increase artificially the wages of sweatshop workers, according to these writers, is misguided on two counts. First, it is an interference with the autonomous choices of employers and workers.
Second, it is likely to make workers worse off, since employers will respond by either moving operations to a new location or employing fewer workers in that location.
Other writers challenge these claims. While granting that workers choose to work in sweatshops, they deny that their choices are voluntary D. Given their very low wages, this suggests that sweatshop workers are exploited.
Moreover, some argue, appealing to a Kantian duty of beneficence, that firms can and should do more for sweatshop workers Snyder To use his example: if one worker performs all of the tasks required to make a pin himself, he can make just a few pins per day.
However, if the worker specializes in one or two of these tasks, and combines his efforts with other workers who specialize in one or two of the other tasks, then together they can make thousands of pins per day. But there is human cost, according to Smith, to the detailed division of labor. Instead, it is a call for labor processes to be arranged so that work is interesting, requires skill, and gives workers substantial decision-making power Arneson ; Michaelson et al.
In response, it has been argued that there is a market for labor, and if workers wanted meaningful work, then employers would have an incentive to provide it Maitland ; Nozick This argument assumes, of course, that workers have the financial ability to trade wages for meaningfulness.
The above argument treats meaningful work as a matter of preference: as a job amenity that employers can decline to offer or that workers can trade away. Others resist this understanding. According to Schwartz , employers are required to offer employees meaningful work, and employees are required to perform it, out of respect for autonomy.
The thought is: the autonomous persons makes choices for herself; she does not mindlessly follow others' directions. A difficulty for this argument is that respect for autonomy does not seem to require that we make all choices for ourselves.
A person might, it seems, autonomously choose to allow important decisions to be made for her in certain spheres of her life, e. A call for meaningful work may thus be understood as a call for workplaces to be arranged so that this deterioration does not occur Arneson ; S.
Arnold In addition to Smith, Marx  was clearly concerned about the effects of work on human flourishing. Formative arguments face two difficulties. One is establishing the connection between meaningless work and autonomous choice or another intellectual faculty.
They assume that it is better for people to have fully developed faculties of autonomous choice etc. Both assumptions may be challenged. Neutralists in political philosophy think that the state should not promote the good, at least when there is reasonable disagreement about what is good see, e. While different theorists give different definitions of whistleblowing see, e.
In the above example, you would be a whistleblower because you are 1 an employee 2 who discloses non-public information 3 about illegal activity in a firm 4 to people outside of it 5 in an effort to stop that activity. Debate about whistleblowing tends to focus on the question of when whistleblowing is justified—in the sense of when it is permissible, or when it is required.
This debate assumes that whistleblowing requires justification, or is wrong, other things equal. Many business ethicists make this assumption on the grounds that employees have a pro tanto duty of loyalty to their firms see, e. Against this, some argue that the relationship between the firm and the employee is purely transactional—an exchange of money for labor Duska —and so is not normatively robust enough to ground a duty of loyalty.
For a discussion of this issue, see the entry on loyalty. One prominent justification of whistleblowing is due to DeGeorge According to him, it is permissible for an employee to blow the whistle when his doing so will prevent harm to society. In a similar account, Brenkert  says that the duty to blow the whistle derives from a duty to prevent wrongdoing. The duty to prevent harm has more weight than the duty of loyalty. To determine whether whistleblowing is not simply permissible but required, DeGeorge says, we must take into account the likely success of the whistleblowing and its effects on the whistleblower himself.
Humans are tribal creatures, and whistleblowers are often treated badly by their colleagues. So if whistleblowing is unlikely to succeed, then it need not be attempted. Another account of whistleblowing is given by Davis Like Brenkert and unlike DeGeorge , Davis focuses on the wrongdoing that the firm engages in not the harm it causes.
Whistleblowing picks out a real and important phenomenon. But it does not seem morally distinctive, in the sense that the values and duties involved in it are familiar. Loyalty to an individual or group may require that we give preference to her or their interests, to an extent.
Business Administracion y Finance Workbook
And yet, in general, we should avoid complicity in immoral behavior, and should also make an effort to prevent harm and wrongdoing, especially when our efforts are likely to succeed and are not personally very costly. On the accounts given above, whistleblowing is simply the attempt to act in accordance with these values, and discharge these duties, in the context of the workplace. The firm in society Businesses as a whole command enormous resources, and as a result can have an enormous impact on society.
One way that businesses impact society, of course, is by producing goods and services and by providing jobs. A famous example of CSR involves the pharmaceutical company Merck. In the late s, Merck was developing a drug to treat parasites in livestock, and it was discovered that a version of the drug might be used treat River Blindness, a disease that causes debilitating itching, pain, and eventually blindness.
The problem was that the drug would cost millions of dollars to develop, and would generate little or no revenue for Merck, since the people afflicted with River Blindness—millions of sub-Saharan Africans—were too poor to afford it. In the end, Merck decided to develop the drug.
PDF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION FINANCE SB GS Burlington Books Download
As expected, it was effective in treating River Blindness, but Merck made no money from it. As of this writing in , Merck, now in concert with several nongovernmental organizations, continues to manufacture and distribute the drug for free throughout the developing world.
The scholarly literature on CSR is dominated by social scientists. Their question is typically whether, when, and how socially responsible actions benefit firms financially. That is, it is not clear whether prosocial behavior by firms causes them to be rewarded financially e. Since our concern is with normative questions, we will focus on moral reasons for and against CSR. Some writers connect the debate about CSR with the debate about the ends of corporate governance.
Thus Friedman objects to CSR, saying that managers should be maximizing shareholder wealth instead. Stakeholder theory is thought to be more accommodating of prosocial activity by firms, since it permits firms to do things other than increase shareholder wealth.
But we do not need to see the debate about CSR as arguments about the proper ends of corporate governance. We can see it as a debate about the means to those ends, with some arguing, and others denying, that certain acts of prosocial behavior are required no matter what ends a firm pursues. Many writers give broadly consequentialist reasons for CSR. The arguments tend to go as follows: 1 there are serious problems in the world, such as poverty, conflict, environmental degradation, and so on; 2 any agent with the resources and knowledge necessary to ameliorate these problems has a moral responsibility to do so, assuming the costs they incur on themselves are not great; 3 firms have the resources and knowledge necessary to ameliorate these problems without incurring great costs; therefore, 4 firms should ameliorate these problems.
Not only is there an opportunity to increase social welfare by alleviating suffering, suffering people may also have a right to assistance. The controversial issue is who should do something to help, and how much they should do. Thus defenders of the above argument focus most of their attention on establishing that firms have these duties, against those who say that these duties are properly assigned to states or individuals.
Strudler legitimates altruistic behavior by firms by undermining the claim that shareholders own them, and so are owed their surplus wealth.
Hsieh says that, even if we concede that firms do not have social obligations, individuals have them, and the best way for many individuals to discharge them is through the activities of their firms see also McMahon Debates about CSR are not just debates about whether specific social ills should be addressed by specific corporations. They are also debates about what sort of society we want to live in. While acknowledging that firms benefit society through CSR, Brenkert b thinks it is a mistake for people to encourage firms to engage in CSR as a practice.
When we do so, he says, we cede a portion of the public sphere to private actors. Instead of deciding together how we want to ameliorate social ills affecting our fellow community members, we leave it up to private organizations to decide what to do. Instead of sharpening our skills of democracy through deliberation, and reaffirming social bonds through mutual aid, we allow our skills and bonds to atrophy through disuse. They support candidates for election, defend positions on issues in public debate, lobby government officials, and more see Stark What does business ethics say about these activities?
This research focuses on such questions as: What forms does CPA take? What are the antecedents of CPA? What are its consequences? CPA raises many normative questions as well. One question is whether firms are the right type of entities to engage in political activity. In large states, citizens often find it useful to join associations of like-minded others, the purpose of which is to represent their views in political decision-making.
But while organizations like the Republican Party and the Sierra Club are suitable participants in the political arena, it is not clear that organizations like Merck or Wal-Mart are.
Some have criticized the U. Alternatively, we might see firms as legitimate speakers on behalf of certain points of view Stark Scholars have also raised questions about the goals of CPA. One thing a firm might do when it engages in CPA is provide valuable information to government officials. Society has an interest in knowing how proposed economic policies will affect firms; firms themselves are a good source of information on these questions.
Questions have been raised about the nature and permissibility of rent-seeking. According to standard definitions, rent-seeking is socially wasteful economic activity intended to secure benefits from the state rather than from the market.
But there is disagreement about what counts as waste. A related issue is whether firms are permitted to engage in rent-seeking behavior. For example, when the Rana Plaza collapsed in Bangladesh in , killing more than garment industry workers, new building codes and systems of enforcement were put into place.
But they were put into place by the multinational corporations that are supplied by factories in Bangladesh, not by the government of Bangladesh. Scherer and Palazzo , are major contributors to this debate. There is little doubt that firms can benefit society through political CSR. The building codes put into place by Western multinationals may well save the lives of many Bangladeshi garment workers. Unless new forms of corporate governance can be devised, however, these benefits may come at a cost to democratic self-rule.
A still more subtle way that firms can engage in political activity is through the exercise of their property rights Christiano A firm might move out of a state in response to the passage of a law it does not favor, or it may threaten to move out of a state if such a law is passed.
As with certain cases of political CSR, we may applaud the results of this kind of political activity. Many applauded when the state of Indiana revised its law permitting discrimination against members of the LGBT community on grounds of religious liberty in response to claims by powerful firms, such as Salesforce.
But it is unclear whether such behavior by firms should be encouraged. We may wish to draw a distinction between private individuals influencing political decision-making by exercising their property rights and firms doing the same thing.
Operating internationally heightens the salience of a number of the ethical issues discussed above, such as CSR, but it also raises new issues, such as relativism and divestment. Two issues often discussed in connection with international business are not treated in this section.
One is wages and working conditions in overseas factories, often called sweatshops. Elimination of all but a few of the concepts is naturally a subjective process. The number of product concepts finally chosen depends on the resources of the company and its strategy for new products.
Given limited resources, should a company select only one or two concepts and spend most of its resources on developing communication plans, or should it retain four or five product concepts and test only a few communication plans for each one?
The answer to this question must reflect the history and strengths of the organization. The next step in our ideal new product development is creating a preliminary profit plan that estimates the length of the payout. Based largely on estimates by experienced marketing executives, this profit plan can eliminate product candidates that do not reach the minimum payout period set by management. Each stage in the exhibit replaces management estimates with data, thereby reducing the range of uncertainty in estimating the profit plan.
The center section of the exhibit has three columns—product development, strategy development, and communication development. These columns emphasize a very important point: the steps contained in them are taken simultaneously, not serially. Advertising development, for example, does not wait until a product is refined before starting its work, but begins immediately on the problem of communicating the concept reflected in the item.
Anticipated availability of a product in part determines the methods for its testing. For instance, a minimum of facilities may be required to produce actual products for testing a product extension such as the addition of a lemon flavor to an existing brand. In contrast, a new home entertainment center requires a whole new production facility. In this latter case, the concept is pretested in the first stage of product testing and the product in the second stage.
See the exhibit. At the conclusion of these concept and product tests, the profit plan can then be revised to take into account information derived from the research. These new data suggest levels of production costs and therefore of product acceptability. If a proposed product meets the minimum payout period, it can then go into extended product use tests. Marketing strategy requires setting goals, pricing strategies, and distribution strategies for a new product.
Rough estimates of price ranges may be part of product testing. If your company plans to use its present channels of distribution, the channel strategy may be that of determining how to get your channel to accept the new product.
Communication strategy includes the development of the package, the copy theme for advertisements, and the selection of the desired media mix.
It is important to note that the communication plan feeds into the development of the marketing mix plans for strategy development. The estimated cost of the communication plan is input for the final estimated profit plan. The plan is then submitted to management for approval in order to proceed to the test market stage. When, then, should a test market be done? But when product and communications research have already told you that you have a successful product and communication plan, why should you go to the expense of test marketing, adding to the costs of delayed revenues from a successful item?
The test market combines both these elements. Furthermore, it tests the elements of the plan and their combinations in the real world. In most cases, the company can rely on its experience with the trade to estimate future acceptance. Consumer response By measuring levels of consumer awareness, product trial, repeat download, market share, and sales volume, the test market gives some indication of the productivity of the elements of the marketing plan.
The decision is then a financial one, the data from the test markets having been inputs into the profit plan. Test markets provide better estimates of consumer response than any pretesting.
In other words, one has to be very specific about what one wants from a test market. It cannot fine-tune a payout plan between a two share and a three share. The other reason to test market is to determine how to market the product. The Chesebrough sales force and Chesebrough as a company have built a fine reputation in the health and beauty-aid field. So you would want to see the capacity of your sales force to sell an unfamiliar product to unfamiliar downloaders.
Experience in the product category enables the researcher to make reliable estimates of trade acceptance. And just the sheer fact that he visits adds impetus to a product.
Since hair sprays came in much larger containers than most hair preparations for men, more shelf space was required to stock the same number of competing brands. And because retailers tend to devote a fixed amount of shelf space to a particular product category, many of the companies with me-too products had difficulty getting trade acceptance for copied items.
When measuring trade acceptance is not a problem as is often the case , a marketer may use a controlled store test, which greatly reduces the time required to run a test market. A resounding success in, say, Albany is often useful to the salesman seeking trade acceptance in St. The salesman is equipped with real market results, not in-house test results or the results of a survey.
The only question is whether the results in Albany are applicable to the situation in St. How to improve marketing productivity As we discussed earlier, you should run a test market only after extensive pretesting has shown that your new product will be a winner. And even though it is useful to get better estimates of consumer and trade acceptance, some marketers design their test markets to provide these better estimates and to provide information that will enable them to improve the productivity of the plan.
So the question becomes one of how high you can go, how much leverage through your marketing variables you can apply to the business to make it bigger. And I will use the test market to derive a means to make my product an even bigger success. There are the effects of sampling to be learned.
We conducted an informal survey of 25 marketing research executives attending a seminar on test marketing at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill to learn how they recommend using test markets. In two of the markets we went with straight advertising, and in the third market we used a combination of advertising and sampling. The success we found in that third market led us to a national program which used a combination of sampling and advertising.
Similar problems arise in downloading advertising. Marketers who want to use test marketing to test several elements in the marketing mix may want to consider an approach used by Michael von Gonten. This approach uses a single large city as the test site and treats neighborhoods as separate markets. The logistical problems associated with multiple-city tests are therefore greatly reduced.
A single-city test may involve only one sales district. Shipping and warehousing costs are thus reduced. Media downloads are simplified.
Another feature of this design is a competitive one. Testing in a single city reduces exposure to competitors and may make it difficult for them to know the nature of the test. Variables under the control of the marketer—such as sampling, couponing, and in-store variations—may work better in this design than media tests because few print and electronic media have split runs within cities.
City of Bloomington, Illinois
It is naturally possible to design a test that is too complex. Disasters are common in the development and introduction of new products, and test markets are one of the ways to avoid as many disasters as possible. The following is a partial list of the variety of things that have gone wrong in the development of a new product: Because packages would not stack, the scouring pads fell off the shelf.
A dog food discolored on the store shelves. In cold weather, baby food separated into a clear liquid and a sludge. In hot weather, cigarettes in a new package dried out.
A pet food gave the test animals diarrhea. When it was combined with a price reduction, a product change in a liquid detergent was thought by consumers to be dilution with water. Because of insufficient glue, over half of the packages came apart during transit.
Excessive settling in a box of paper tissues caused the box to be one-third empty at download. A large proportion of samples was not delivered until long after the test. It is difficult, however, to justify a test market solely as a disaster check. My feeling is that it is an awfully expensive dry run. Many researchers caution against two major misuses. Evaluation, not generation or development Test marketing is the last step in a process whose goal is a successful product.
The beginning of this process, as we showed in the exhibit, is designed to generate many ideas with a minimum of evaluation. These ideas are then subjected to a series of screenings using criteria established by corporate policy. For instance, the first screen in the exhibit is a financial one—a rough profit plan that compares the estimated payout period with the maximum period allowed by corporate policy.
Concepts that pass through this screen receive further evaluation as they pass through successive screens during product and communication development. A concept that fails to pass through a screen may be killed, or it may be reevaluated and revised. The outputs of the product and communication developments should be combined with the marketing strategy to form a complete marketing plan.
From this point, the process should be concerned with the evaluation of the plan and some fine-tuning, not with generation or development. If idea generation and concept development appear at the test market stage, these reflect an unwillingness on the part of management to kill products earlier.
If your process lets everything get through to test market, you are, by definition, not going to work on many ideas and you are not going to have many successes unless you just happen to have blind, dumb luck.International agencies have also created codes of ethics for business.
For example, when the Rana Plaza collapsed in Bangladesh in , killing more than garment industry workers, new building codes and systems of enforcement were put into place. Datti una regola. Hallo my friend welcome to our web!!! PDF ActivaR.: The number of product concepts finally chosen depends on the resources of the company and its strategy for new products.
Download Asistencia y cuidado del paciente de parkinson PDF. This is a missed opportunity.